When I was travelling in Europe in October I saw the author of a book being interviewed on television. He had accumulated a list of 1000 events or situations that would give you an emotional uplift or generally happy feeling, just to remind ourselves that within all the bad news we see there are also positive occasions, even though they can often be quite small and therefore pass unappreciated. The man is certainly an optimist!
Last week I was reminded of that book when experiencing two personal happy moments. Firstly, after a long struggle my son finally managed to ride a bicycle without any help or aids. There he was, wobbly but riding all on his own. A superb moment. Secondly, it was time for the annual JRP group photo show and I decided to go into my archives an edited a series of 12 photographs on the theme of “night” together, taken over a period of 5-6 years on film and digital. After struggling with editing, sequencing and printing (my first all-inkjet show) I was like the years before very happy to see the results hanging on the wall and being looked at by visitors.
The two moments are not as unrelated as one may think. I often think of my photos as almost child-like. When good work is strong enough, I feel that it can stand on its own and no longer needs me to explain or otherwise attend or foster it. The images take on a life and meaning on their own, independent from me, their creator. It’s almost as if they’re not made by me at all.
I was also reminded once more of how important the process of showing your work in public is. The thoughts that one needs to put into editing, sequencing and printing alone, which I mentioned above, will force you to reflect on your work in a way you normally wouldn’t. When putting your work in a finished, presentable format in front of people and perhaps being asked to comment on it is really a test for yourself whether you feel that you have done all you could to produce work to the best of your abilities. And before you think, “well, I regularly put galleries on my photo blog and Flickr sets to receive feedback”, it just isn’t the same, not even remote. I would not even count putting photos on the web as “publishing” nowadays, because it requires so little effort and, what’s more and that’s the key here, you will not be held accountable for what you have produced by anyone. It’s so easy to just say “well, that was just a small thing, I could do much better if I really wanted to”. Really? With electronic publishing, there will be no face to face discussions with your viewers, no “I wish had done this differently” thoughts when you cannot change anymore what’s hanging on the wall. This is where the true learning process lies, in feeling the excitement and also pains of creation. That’s not to say that electronic publishing has no merits, but there are certain ways to sneak out of your need to take responsibility for what you have done.
I used to be skeptical about the prevalent mode of operation of Tokyo’s photo galleries, where you essentially pay to rent the space for a week. There is no major hurdle to enter the game except the budget to pull it off. The same goes for photo book publishing. I have changed my mind. If anything, you do the exhibition for yourself, to progress and learn. You don’t need a workshop, just spend the money on the gallery space. During the preparations you will be running around seeking advice, and learn. Who wants to deliver something not their best when spending over $/€1000?
Put simply, everyone should be doing a gallery show or exhibition at least once a year. The venue almost does not matter, remember, this is mostly for yourself. Only a fraction of people interested in photography will ever do so. Those who do, I see as photographers, the rest are camera enthusiasts and people ‘interested in photography’, frequenting photo web sites and giving advice to others on how to “impove” their photography. Nothing wrong with that, just be aware of your own ambitions and where you stand right now.
I enjoyed this thoughtful post. I agree that arranging an exhibit is a hugely educational experience… although not always a “happy moment”!
I used to belong to a cooperative art gallery which enabled me to have a solo show of my work once a year. I enjoyed the process of printing the invitations, arranging entertainment and refreshments, and having an evening on which to remind my friends that I actually was a “real photographer.” However, the task of selecting the work — of confronting my past year’s successes, or lack thereof — was tremendously depressing! It took me several years of exhibits before I learned that the period of depression was a normal, predictable part of the process… although knowing that didn’t make it any easier to get through it. I’m glad your experience was better.
Incidentally, thank you for another year of valuable service in making Japanese photo-culture visible to Western eyes. Best regards!
Thank you very much for reading us and taking the time to comment.
I think the whole process of exhibiting is very demanding and perhaps I have also just been lucky and started “easy” with those group shows. As with everything, if you get too ambitious too early on, the experience may disillusion you so much to give it up altogether. Then a mentor can perhaps help. Nonetheless, I think in small and appropriate doses the pain might be worth it. I hope my son would agree after falling off his bicycle a few times before enjoying the feeling of eventual success!
A very good post Dirk. I recently started a gallery of my photos the ‘the ship’ in an area I walk past 20 times a day. While there is a certain feeling off pride that I shot, printed and eventually published in a physical format (as opposed to online publishing) at the same time there is the uncertainty that your work will not be well received and not stand up on its own or that you have to constantly explain what you were trying to achieve. Also I some times stop to admire the images and feel a certain disconnection with them, like I’m looking at somebody else’s work.
The whole thing has produced some interesting reactions, the most important being how I see my work and for the first time being able to edit down a group of images to produce an interesting gallery off related images. Generally this has given me a good feeling and I now want to publish more work have have it on public display.
Not quite sure I’m ready for a gallery exhibition yet but a small coffee shop would do nicely 🙂
Congratulation Dirk, to the event and satisfaction with your set of images.
I did few exhibition of my work in last ten years. As much as I always enjoyed the process, I was put back with ignorance and non interest of viewers visiting it especially with connection to high costs for preparing such a event.
I put same amount of care and thoughts into creation of my portfolio projects, presented on my website. With much less costs I feel better. Usually I also received much more useful feedback.
Couldn’t agree more, Dirk. The moment I left photo sharing sites and showed my prints at portfolio reviews my work took a whole new turn. Print is the operative word there. It’s a whole set of complications, but also creative possibilities to print your work, be it on an inkjet printer, in the chemical darkroom, using alternative processes or a printing press and gravure plates. I must admit I haven’t done the last thing for a long while, it goes beyond onerous!
Anyway, the input you get when you show your work can only widen your view. Be it constructive suggestions or harsh put-downs like I’ve received at Arles or the ignorance of the masses (coupled with a penchant for LOL cat pictures, one might suspect) like richo experienced, it will inform your further work and the addressees and venues you show your work to in the future.
Alternatively, spend much, much less than $/€1000 and enter your work into juried group shows. Sure, some are cowboy outfits set up primarily to make money, but there are numerous worthwhile events in Japan and overseas that charge no more than 30/40 bucks for submissions. Some are even free.
In this way, your work is judged by unbiased jurors, many of whom are recognized in their fields, against work from photographers across the globe. There’s no guarantee, of course, that your work will be accepted, but that’s surely one of the appeals.
“The major hurdle” of budget you mention is removed, leaving only your own ability to express yourself through the medium as a potential stumbling block.
Yes, it is a good thing to do, but in my experience does not give you the Happy Moment feeling at the same intensity. My point is that the preparation for the exhibition and all what follows is the healthy part, not “making it” into something. The good feeling derives from doing the show, not a submission to a competition or juried show. You might get admitted or rejected and never be the wiser why and how, and you’ll never print say 30 photos at gallery quality for your submission or portfolio review. Doing your own show gives you complete freedom – which in itself is not so easy to deal with, because often we would prefer to have constraints not total freedom.
As a working photojournalist who has had hundreds of photos and tens of photo stories published, I’m rather surprised to hear I’m not actually a photographer just because I’ve never held an exhibition.
and paid for the privilege rather than being paid myself, to boot!
Hi Tony, thanks – the discussion was not about people who are getting paid for taking photos. My implicit working definition is about people who use photography as self-expression; of course both is possible simultaneously, so in case you see yourself within that definition and have a lot of photos that others deemed valuable enough to pay for them, why not hold an exhibition yourself?
Hi Dirk,
My comment was pretty tongue-in-cheek. I’m not sure why I haven’t done an exhibition yet. Probably because I know people are seeing my photos already and because I am busy trying to earn a living, I guess.
One day.
Tony
The difference between getting shots of people holding chairs (and cameras on the streets) published in magazines versus the environment and experience created by a thoughtfully selected exhibition is like the difference between the life of a taxi driver and someone who restores classic cars. Both involve automobiles and while one uses his to make cash the guy with the ’69 Mustang probably has a deeper understanding of driving coming from his investment of time, money, and a different type of mental energy.
John, I’m not sure what I did to earn your enmity and that somewhat snobbish comment.
It would be ridiculous to say that earning money or not has any bearing on a person’s status as a “true” photographer. Couldn’t we leave it at that?
No enmity nor snobbery intended in the least!
Simply, a photojournalist is like a Taxi diver in that they’re given a destination and take their customer to where they ask to be. The vast majority of the photojournalists in the world do so quickly and in as a direct course as possible. This isn’t a snide statement, and I’d never suggest that this isn’t a viable or fulfilling career for those who wish to pursue it. I personally have nothing but respect for those who have found their calling.
You are right that financial gain should not the bearing by which a “true” Photographer should be measured.
However, I wonder if basing one’s own appreciation for their work on the number of potential viewers is somewhat limiting. The joy (and terror) of holding an exhibition is that it places you literally side by side with viewers in a venue specifically set to show what you’ve personally found worth the effort to share. Insights gained from these experiences are extremely important in seeing one’s photography as something that fits into a larger conversation about the craft and world. It’s a different way of dealing with things and is a wonderful problem to arrange for oneself.
Hopefully you will have the time to get a show together sometime soon.