<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rayqual releases Nikon F and Contax/Yashica to Micro 4/3 lens adapter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.japanexposures.com/2009/06/05/rayqual-releases-nikon-f-and-contaxyashica-to-micro-43-lens-adapter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.japanexposures.com/2009/06/05/rayqual-releases-nikon-f-and-contaxyashica-to-micro-43-lens-adapter/</link>
	<description>a personal introduction to Japanese photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:45:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barney Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.japanexposures.com/2009/06/05/rayqual-releases-nikon-f-and-contaxyashica-to-micro-43-lens-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanexposures.com/?p=3307#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>Short answer, no. Long answer, yes and no.

Yes, depth of field remains the same, but as field of view changes depending on the sensor, to get the same depth of field to sacrafice field of view. If you want the same field of view, you then alter the depth of field. This can be a good or a bad thing depending on the effect you&#039;re looking to achieve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short answer, no. Long answer, yes and no.</p>
<p>Yes, depth of field remains the same, but as field of view changes depending on the sensor, to get the same depth of field to sacrafice field of view. If you want the same field of view, you then alter the depth of field. This can be a good or a bad thing depending on the effect you&#8217;re looking to achieve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew eccles</title>
		<link>http://www.japanexposures.com/2009/06/05/rayqual-releases-nikon-f-and-contaxyashica-to-micro-43-lens-adapter/comment-page-1/#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew eccles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.japanexposures.com/?p=3307#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking about buying a digital body and an adaptor but don&#039;t like the size of the Canon 5D. Is the Lumix a comparable solution (sensor size aside)? Does this mean I can use fast lenses (as far as f1.2?)and get the same DoF effect as with film?

All guidance welcome; many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking about buying a digital body and an adaptor but don&#8217;t like the size of the Canon 5D. Is the Lumix a comparable solution (sensor size aside)? Does this mean I can use fast lenses (as far as f1.2?)and get the same DoF effect as with film?</p>
<p>All guidance welcome; many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
